This entry was posted on Saturday, August 30th, 2008 at 2:40 pm and is filed under 2008 Elections, Favorite Nevada Blogs, Not Good, Ron Paul. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.
E!! The True Conservative Story™
Putting the E!! in ConsErvativE blogging in Nevada and nationally
After carrying herself in a fair, patient, and professional manner over the past eight months, it seems Sue Lowden must now bear up under the label “inept” by the RNC Committee on Contests. This tag seems harsh and unfair in light of the extreme difficulty and complexity of Lowden’s position this election cycle.
The real story – which is not one of party ineptitude but instead of the combative and unreasonable demeanor of one Mr. Jeff Greenspan – began early this year. Greenspan, an official Ron Paul campaign representative with whom Lowden was working after Paul received 14 percent of the vote in our presidential caucuses, agreed that the Nevada GOP would give Paul 14 percent of the state delegation (equating to four delegates). Lowden invited Ron Paul to speak at our state convention, and Greenspan submitted the names of four Ron Paul supporters to the Nominating Committee for consideration.
But on the morning of the convention, April 26, for reasons I have yet to understand, Greenspan went back on the deal with the Nevada GOP. Instead of moving to an up-or-down vote on the delegate candidates pre-screened from the dozens that had been submitted for consideration, Greenspan teamed up with a Paul supporter named Mike Weber, led a floor “revolt,” and threw the convention into chaos. How did they accomplish this? By insisting on opening up nominations from the floor. This resulted in some 287 new nominations for 31 delegate slots and 31 alternates.
There was no way the convention and/or state party could hear and vet 287 last-minute nominations in one day. In fact, in light of the time it takes to hear individual speeches/pitches for candidacy, eat meals, take bathroom breaks, allow for interruptions, and take care of other necessary convention business, it is doubtful whether full, fair and proper vetting of 287 new delegate candidates could have been done in two, three, or even four days.
And so it was that the well coordinated, pre-arranged delegate selection process put in place by the party and agreed to by Jeff Greenspan turned into an unholy mess. The convention fell apart. And to outsiders, the process meltdown probably did appear “inept.”
After the convention fell apart, Greenspan, Weber, and other Paul supporters like Wayne Terhune continued their crusade, doing what they could to impede reconvening and even holding their own unsanctioned “convention” in June. Due to the boycott by the Paul people, the GOP was unable to obtain enough RSVPs to obtain a quorum for the reconvening of the official state convention.
This week the RNC Committee on Contests reviewed the matter, ruled that the Paul “convention” in June was unauthorized, rejected the “delegates” that were “elected” at that meeting, and recommended a compromise by which the Nevada Republican Party will replace four of the current convention delegates (which the Nevada GOP’s Executive Committee appointed last month) with four Ron Paul delegates.
Readers will note that four delegates is exactly the number of delegates the Nevada GOP had originally agreed to include before Greenspan reneged on the original deal.
Chairwoman Sue Lowden has agreed to the compromise.
“It was always my intention and hope to bring the Ron Paul people into our party,” she said yesterday. “In fact, I was the only state Republican party chairman to invite Ron Paul to speak at our state GOP convention. So I’m more than happy to accept the compromise proposal from the Contest Committee, especially since it’s exactly what we had already agreed to last April.”
The matter is scheduled to move to the national convention’s Credentials Committee next. If the Paul camp also accepts the compromise proposal, this mess will be at an end.
Either way, Greenspan and his minions owe Sue Lowden an apology for their antics and the tremendous amount of time and energy that has been wasted trying to work with them and around them. And Ron Paul should dismiss Greenspan from his campaign.
2 Responses to “Sympathy for Nevada GOP Chairwoman Sue Lowden”
August 30th, 2008 at 5:16 pm
Greenspan has been rather ugly in denying there ever was a deal, per se. In fact, you could almost say the guy’s been a complete fool about the whole affair.
The logic for going back on the deal at the Nevada Republican Convention was twofold. First, Greenspan never cleared the arrangement with the rest of the delegates. Second, the hope was that by winning a majority of the delegates in Nevada, other states would follow… kind of like a domino effect.
That didn’t play out so well.
What boggles my brain — and this is just me thinking out loud — is how Greenspan, Weber, or Terhune could possibly justify disenfranchising the 86% of Nevada Republicans who voted for ANYONE BUT Ron Paul in the January caucuses.
Don’t those people count too?
I gotta agree with you, E. I’m not sure who signs Jeff Greenspan’s paycheck, but they should be taking a long, hard look at the way he’s behaved this summer. Definitely not someone I’d want on my team.
Mike Davis’s last blog post..RNC Chooses the Nevada Republican Delegation
August 31st, 2008 at 1:51 pm
You fail to mention all the ways that Sue Lowden and her inner circle tried to circumvent the will of the majority of the delegates at the April 26th convention. For one thing, don’t you think it is telling that 287 people wanted to be delegates to the national convention? Under the scheme suggested by the party leadership, most of these would not have had a chance because few were on the list put forward by the leadership. Secondly, the leadership deliberately withheld the names on their list of nominees and deliberately withheld the method of delegate selection until the day of the convention. Everything they had planned in the way of delegate selection was secret until the day of the convention. This was not a strategy that inspired confidence of the delegates. Finally, the vote to reject the leadership’s method of delegate selection was about 750 to 450, an overwhelming defeat. The only way Sue Lowden could turn this defeat into a victory was to steal the election by forcing a recess, contrary to the rules. Sue won by cheating - that’s the bottom line.