<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>E!! The True Conservative Story™ &#187; Bush</title>
	<atom:link href="http://elizabethcrum.blogivists.com/tag/bush/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://elizabethcrum.blogivists.com</link>
	<description>Elizabeth Crum !! Putting the "E" in conservative blogging in Nevada &#38; nationally</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 01 Jun 2009 02:31:55 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Exit Polls</title>
		<link>http://elizabethcrum.blogivists.com/2008/11/03/exit-polls/</link>
		<comments>http://elizabethcrum.blogivists.com/2008/11/03/exit-polls/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Nov 2008 03:48:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>E!!</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2008 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2004]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2008]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bush]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[election]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[exit polls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kerry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[McCain]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obama]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://elizabethcrum.blogivists.com/?p=375</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Tomorrow afternoon &#8211; when the polls have not yet closed and the exit polls are all we have to talk about - let&#8217;s not forget that the 2004 exit polls had everyone predicting an easy Kerry win. 
Exit polling is not scientific.  Someone stands outside the poll place and asks voters, &#8220;Will you tell me who you voted for?&#8221;  People can answer [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tomorrow afternoon &#8211; when the polls have not yet closed and the exit polls are all we have to talk about - let&#8217;s not forget that the 2004 exit polls had everyone predicting an easy Kerry win. </p>
<p>Exit polling is not scientific.  Someone stands outside the poll place and asks voters, &#8220;Will you tell me who you voted for?&#8221;  People can answer or take a pass.</p>
<p>Historically, exit polls do tend to skew Democratic.  I&#8217;ve heard various theories as to why:  some say it&#8217;s the bias of the exit pollers; some say conservatives/Republicans tend to be more private so don&#8217;t share personal information as easily.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://elizabethcrum.blogivists.com/2008/11/03/exit-polls/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>TARP</title>
		<link>http://elizabethcrum.blogivists.com/2008/09/24/tarp/</link>
		<comments>http://elizabethcrum.blogivists.com/2008/09/24/tarp/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Sep 2008 02:03:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>E!!</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bush]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[OMG]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Paulson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TARP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Troubled Asset Relief Program]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://elizabethcrum.blogivists.com/?p=241</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[K. emails from Michigan that a TARP &#8211; ref: Paulson&#8217;s Troubled Asset Relief Program - is (literally) a COVERING used to protect something that has been EXPOSED.  (She adds &#8220;Duh&#8221; for emphasis.)
Along these same lines, BS is (literally) a bunch of crap that comes out of the orifice of a creature at the end of all its gluttonous gorging.
I think we&#8217;re [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>K. emails from Michigan that a <a href="http://calculatedrisk.blogspot.com/2008/09/paulson-transcript-troubled-asset.html" target="_blank">TARP</a> &#8211; ref: Paulson&#8217;s <em>Troubled Asset Relief Program</em> - is (literally) a COVERING used to protect something that has been EXPOSED.  (She adds &#8220;Duh&#8221; for emphasis.)</p>
<p>Along these same lines, BS is (literally) a bunch of crap that comes out of the orifice of a creature at the end of all its gluttonous gorging.</p>
<p>I think we&#8217;re on to something here&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://elizabethcrum.blogivists.com/2008/09/24/tarp/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Not to Worry:  Paulson&#8217;s Wizards on Stand By</title>
		<link>http://elizabethcrum.blogivists.com/2008/09/22/not-to-worry-paulsons-wizards-on-stand-by/</link>
		<comments>http://elizabethcrum.blogivists.com/2008/09/22/not-to-worry-paulsons-wizards-on-stand-by/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Sep 2008 03:37:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>E!!</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2008 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Balanced Budgets]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cold Hard Cash]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Corruption and Greed]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Corruption in Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Energy Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fleecing the Taxpayers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Government Spending]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John McCain]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[government bailouts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[$700 billion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bailout]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Banking Committee]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bankruptcy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[banks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[billions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bush]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[businesses]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[capital]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[capital gains tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chris Dodd]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[corporate tax rate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[crisis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Doo Doo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[entrepreneurs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fannie]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Freddie]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[liquidity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[London]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New York]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Newt Gingrich]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Paulson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pelosi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reid]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sarbanes-Oxley]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[short selling]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[stocks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[taxpayer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[voice of reason]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wall Street]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://elizabethcrum.blogivists.com/?p=233</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Since hearing word of widespread support (Paulson, Congress and the President) for the latest, greatest Bailout I&#8217;ve been feeling increasingly dejected.  And concerned.  And angry.
Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson has a &#8220;plan&#8221; which will &#8220;shift&#8221; $700 billion in obligations from private companies to the American taxpayer.  Apparently he sees this as the only Way and has 9,000 wizards on stand-by to [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Since hearing word of widespread support (Paulson, Congress and the President) for the latest, greatest Bailout I&#8217;ve been feeling increasingly dejected.  And concerned.  And angry.</p>
<p>Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson has a &#8220;plan&#8221; which will &#8220;shift&#8221; $700 billion in obligations from private companies to the American taxpayer.  Apparently he sees this as the only Way and has 9,000 wizards on stand-by to make it so.  (The same Wall Street wizards that got us into this mess, no doubt?)</p>
<p>And evidently most members of Congress are spellbound and preparing to waft more money New York&#8217;s way.</p>
<p>One can only imagine what Banking Committee Chairman Chris Dodd (the largest beneficiary of political funds from Fannie &amp; Freddie) will dream up as he joins hands and sings Tra La La La La with Reid and Pelosi.  I&#8217;m not sure how it ends, but I&#8217;m pretty sure the working title is <em>Nightmare on Wall Street </em>and that we are barely ten minutes in.</p>
<p>Setting the typically wrong-headed Paulson aside for a moment, how is it that Bush and Congress care so little about protecting the American taxpayer?</p>
<p>And why all the insistence on a quick solution?  This mess was not created in a week, yet Paulson and our illustrious Congressional geniuses think they can solve it by this Thursday?  Does it not occur to anyone that we need to take a deep breath, wade in, and calmly and pragmatically work our way through our <strong>many</strong> economic and financial problems in a careful and measured manner?</p>
<p>As Newt <a href="http://newt.org/tabid/193/articleType/ArticleView/articleId/3725/Default.aspx" target="_blank">blogged</a> today (thank God for Mr. Gingrich), between the crisis of liquidity on Wall Street, the crisis of bad energy policy that transfers $700 billion a year to foreign nations, the crisis of Sarbanes-Oxley that cripples entrepreneurs/start ups and drives banks and businesses from New York to London, and the crisis of a high corporate tax rate&#8230;we are in some very deep Doo Doo.</p>
<p>Newt proposes a &#8221;non-bureaucratic solution that would stop the liquidity crisis almost overnight and do it using private capital rather than taxpayer money.&#8221;  He suggests four reforms that would do the trick without the bureaucracy and additional tax burden.  I suggest you read his blog post as it is well worth the time, but in summation they are:</p>
<p>#1  Stop the mark-to-market rule which is forcing companies into unnecessary bankruptcy. If short selling can be suspended on 799 stocks, the mark-to-market rule can be suspended for six months and then replaced with a more accurate three year rolling average mark-to-market. </p>
<p>#2  Repeal Sarbanes-Oxley. It failed with Freddy, Fannie, Bear Stearns, Lehman Brothers, and AIG. It is crippling our entrepreneurial economy. One San Jose firm told Newt they would bring more than 20 companies public in the next year if the law was repealed. It&#8217;s Sarbanes-Oxley’s $3 million per startup annual accounting fee that is keeping these companies private.</p>
<p>#3  Go to a zero capital gains tax like China and Singapore.  Private capital will flood into Wall Street (at no cost to Joe Taxpayer) and lead to an increase in federal revenue through a larger, more prosperous economy.</p>
<p>#4  Pass an “all of the above” energy plan designed to bring home $500 billion of the $700 billion a year we are sending overseas. With that much energy income, our economy would boom.</p>
<p>E!! endorses these proposals (a fact I&#8217;m sure Newt is happy to hear) and strongly advises against implementation of the Paulson plan which by all reasoned accounts is going to be a total Mess.</p>
<p>In closing, I&#8217;ll be waiting to see what McCain says and does about all this.  If he doesn&#8217;t reject the Paulson/Bush/Congressional plan and closely align himself with much of what Newt said here, I may not be able to vote for him after all.</p>
<p>(Note:  To those who have heard me joke that I am going to &#8220;get drunk and vote for McCain,&#8221; consider this my semi-official back-peddle&#8230;pending the outcome of this mess and McCain&#8217;s stand on things.  Let&#8217;s see how Maverick-y the self-proclaimed maverick is when it really <em>counts</em>.) </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://elizabethcrum.blogivists.com/2008/09/22/not-to-worry-paulsons-wizards-on-stand-by/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Analyzing Campaign &#8216;08</title>
		<link>http://elizabethcrum.blogivists.com/2008/09/06/analyzing-campaign-08/</link>
		<comments>http://elizabethcrum.blogivists.com/2008/09/06/analyzing-campaign-08/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Sep 2008 16:05:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>E!!</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2008 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2008]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2012]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[analysis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bush]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[campaign]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[candidates]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cheney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Clinton]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Condi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[election]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hillary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[McCain]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rove]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[video]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://elizabethcrum.blogivists.com/?p=198</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[And now for a serious look at this year&#8217;s campaign season (turn speakers on; page load time is worth the wait).
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And now for a <a href="http://www.peteyandpetunia.com:80/VoteHere/VoteHere.htm" target="_blank">serious look</a> at this year&#8217;s campaign season (turn speakers on; page load time is worth the wait).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://elizabethcrum.blogivists.com/2008/09/06/analyzing-campaign-08/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>W Says Special Session No Use</title>
		<link>http://elizabethcrum.blogivists.com/2008/08/04/w-says-special-session-no-use-without-dem-agreement-to-vote/</link>
		<comments>http://elizabethcrum.blogivists.com/2008/08/04/w-says-special-session-no-use-without-dem-agreement-to-vote/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Aug 2008 19:03:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>E!!</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Energy Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[House]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Washington D.C.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[agenda]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bush]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[leaderhip]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Special Session]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[up-down]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[vote]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[W]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[White House]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://elizabethcrum.blogivists.com/?p=62</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Some House Republicans are still carrying on their protest on the floor of the House.  The White House says they will not answer the call for a Special Session because the majority leadership still sets the agenda and no one can force them to do an up-down vote on energy/offshore drilling.
Call, email or write to your House [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Some House Republicans are still carrying on their protest on the floor of the House.  The <a href="http://thehill.com/leading-the-news/white-house-says-no-to-special-session-of-congress-2008-08-04.html" target="_blank"><strong>White House says</strong></a> they will not answer the call for a Special Session because the majority leadership still sets the agenda and no one can force them to do an up-down vote on energy/offshore drilling.</p>
<p><a href="http://clerk.house.gov/member_info/index.html" target="_blank"><strong>Call, email or write to your House Democrat(s)</strong></a> now and demand that they return to D.C. and put offshore drilling (and other sound energy policy) to a vote.</p>
<p><a title="Clicky Web Analytics" href="http://getclicky.com/40424"><img src="http://static.getclicky.com/media/links/badge.gif" border="0" alt="Clicky Web Analytics" /></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://elizabethcrum.blogivists.com/2008/08/04/w-says-special-session-no-use-without-dem-agreement-to-vote/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
