delegation

Sympathy for Nevada GOP Chairwoman Sue Lowden

Posted by E!! on August 30, 2008
2008 Elections, Blogs of Nevada, Not Good, Ron Paul / 2 Comments

 

After carrying herself in a fair, patient, and professional manner over the past eight months, it seems Sue Lowden must now bear up under the label “inept” by the RNC Committee on Contests.  This tag seems harsh and unfair in light of the extreme difficulty and complexity of Lowden’s position this election cycle.

 

The real story – which is not one of party ineptitude but instead of the combative and unreasonable demeanor of one Mr. Jeff Greenspan – began early this year.  Greenspan, an official Ron Paul campaign representative with whom Lowden was working after Paul received 14 percent of the vote in our presidential caucuses, agreed that the Nevada GOP would give Paul 14 percent of the state delegation (equating to four delegates).  Lowden invited Ron Paul to speak at our state convention, and Greenspan submitted the names of four Ron Paul supporters to the Nominating Committee for consideration.

 

But on the morning of the convention, April 26, for reasons I have yet to understand, Greenspan went back on the deal with the Nevada GOP.  Instead of moving to an up-or-down vote on the delegate candidates pre-screened from the dozens that had been submitted for consideration, Greenspan teamed up with a Paul supporter named Mike Weber, led a floor “revolt,” and threw the convention into chaos.  How did they accomplish this?  By insisting on opening up nominations from the floor.  This resulted in some 287 new nominations for 31 delegate slots and 31 alternates.

 

There was no way the convention and/or state party could hear and vet 287 last-minute nominations in one day.  In fact, in light of the time it takes to hear individual speeches/pitches for candidacy, eat meals, take bathroom breaks, allow for interruptions, and take care of other necessary convention business, it is doubtful whether full, fair and proper vetting of 287 new delegate candidates could have been done in two, three, or even four days.

 

And so it was that the well coordinated, pre-arranged delegate selection process put in place by the party and agreed to by Jeff Greenspan turned into an unholy mess.  The convention fell apart.  And to outsiders, the process meltdown probably did appear “inept.” 

 

After the convention fell apart, Greenspan, Weber, and other Paul supporters like Wayne Terhune continued their crusade, doing what they could to impede reconvening and even holding their own unsanctioned “convention” in June.  Due to the boycott by the Paul people, the GOP was unable to obtain enough RSVPs to obtain a quorum for the reconvening of the official state convention.

 

This week the RNC Committee on Contests reviewed the matter, ruled that the Paul “convention” in June was unauthorized, rejected the “delegates” that were “elected” at that meeting, and recommended a compromise by which the Nevada Republican Party will replace four of the current convention delegates (which the Nevada GOP’s Executive Committee appointed last month) with four Ron Paul delegates. 

 

Readers will note that four delegates is exactly the number of delegates the Nevada GOP had originally agreed to include before Greenspan reneged on the original deal.

 

Chairwoman Sue Lowden has agreed to the compromise.

 

“It was always my intention and hope to bring the Ron Paul people into our party,” she said yesterday.   “In fact, I was the only state Republican party chairman to invite Ron Paul to speak at our state GOP convention.  So I’m more than happy to accept the compromise proposal from the Contest Committee, especially since it’s exactly what we had already agreed to last April.”

 

The matter is scheduled to move to the national convention’s Credentials Committee next.  If the Paul camp also accepts the compromise proposal, this mess will be at an end.

 

Either way, Greenspan and his minions owe Sue Lowden an apology for their antics and the tremendous amount of time and energy that has been wasted trying to work with them and around them.  And Ron Paul should dismiss Greenspan from his campaign.

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

RNC Committee Says Nevada GOP Violated Rules

Posted by E!! on August 29, 2008
2008 Elections, Blogs of Nevada, Conventions / 1 Comment

Here’s a piece in the LVRJ re: the Nevada delegation the Republican National Convention.  

Seems the RNC committee decided that the Nevada GOP violated rules in its delegate election/appointment process.  I remember wondering about all this after the whole Ron Paul Rebellion thing and its aftermath…but I assumed GOP leaders knew what the rules were and that appointing delegates was ok.

Anyway, the committed has recommended a compromise, as I posted earlier this morning.

Tags: , , , , , , , , ,

Update: Nevada Delegation to GOP Convention

Posted by E!! on August 29, 2008
2008 Elections, Blogs of Nevada, Conventions / 1 Comment

From Chuck Muth via email:

The Committee on Contests recommended that the National Convention accept the results of the two congressional district elections at the Nevada GOP convention in April.  Those results give four seats to Ron Paul supporters and two others.  The remainder of the delegation would be selected from the Executive Committees appointments.  This is the BEST the Paultards can hope for at this point.

IF…the Nevada GOP accepts this compromise, the Paultards will get one less delegate than they would have had if Jeff Greenspan would have honored the deal he made with the party to take put five Ron Paul delegates on the official Nominations Committee slate of recommendations last April. 
 
But my understanding is that the Nevada GOP is objecting to the recommendation of the Committee on Contests and this decision will ultimately be made sometime before the start of the convention by the Credentials Committee.  The Nevada GOP has said all along that there were voting irregularities in those congressional district races and aren’t likely to accept the results of those elections.  So it’s still possible that the Paultards will end up with squat.

Tags: , , , , , , , , , ,

RNC Panel Suggests Compromise Group for Nevada Delegation

Well this is interesting.  The Reno Gazette-Journal is reporting that an RNC panel has rejected both the “dueling delegations” from Nevada and has recommended that a  “compromise group” be seated.  This is the first I’ve heard of it.  Let me see what I can find out.

 Update: I still don’t have anything solid to go on, but it’s hard to believe the Nevada GOP would go for a compromise delegation…since that was already offered and turned down by the Paul supporters way back at the state convention last August. (dumb, Dumb, DUMB)

Tags: , , , , , , , , ,

Update re: Nevada Delegation

I have it on excellent authority that:

 

In re: to the Nevada delegation to the Republican National Convention, the Paul supporters will not be seated…but they’re going anyway to attend the separate Ron Paul pep rally.

 

The RNC might still disqualify the Nevada delegation before the convention starts, but McCain’s folks have assured everyone that the delegation will eventually be seated.

 

 

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , ,

Nevada Delegation to Republican National Convention

Posted by E!! on August 26, 2008
2008 Elections, Blogs of Nevada, Conventions / 2 Comments

While I’m researching the latest with our state delegation, Erick Erickson is saying this re: Nevada:

Two states are quietly seizing on the disarray with the Nevada delegation. I’m told quite reliably that if McCain picks a liberal Vice Presidential nominee the majority of delegates in two states plan to force a vote on the convention floor.

From how it was explained to me, five states must support a motion to vote on the nominee. Two states just might do it and they are calculating on Nevada going along with it, which would necessitate only two other states needed.

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , ,