<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>E!! The True Conservative Story™ &#187; Economy</title>
	<atom:link href="http://elizabethcrum.blogivists.com/tag/economy/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://elizabethcrum.blogivists.com</link>
	<description>Elizabeth Crum !! Putting the "E" in conservative blogging in Nevada &#38; nationally</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 01 Jun 2009 02:31:55 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>You Know Things Are Bad When&#8230;</title>
		<link>http://elizabethcrum.blogivists.com/2009/04/08/you-know-things-are-bad-when/</link>
		<comments>http://elizabethcrum.blogivists.com/2009/04/08/you-know-things-are-bad-when/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Apr 2009 21:06:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>E!!</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[capitalism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[capitalism is not dead]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[France]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sarkozy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S.]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://elizabethcrum.blogivists.com/?p=773</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[the French start sounding more sensible than the Americans on economic policy.
Read about President Sarkozy&#8217;s comments on capitalism here.  The Newsmax piece starts with this:
French President Nicolas Sarkozy says that the economic maelstrom that has captivated the world&#8217;s attention for the last 17 months is &#8220;not a crisis of capitalism&#8221; but, in actuality, a breakdown of a system [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>the French start sounding more sensible than the Americans on economic policy.</p>
<p>Read about President Sarkozy&#8217;s comments on capitalism <a href="http://moneynews.newsmax.com/streettalk/sarkozy_capitalism/2009/04/02/198925.html?s=al&amp;promo_code=7D47-1" target="_blank">here</a>.  The Newsmax piece starts with this:</p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px">French President Nicolas Sarkozy says that the economic maelstrom that has captivated the world&#8217;s attention for the last 17 months is &#8220;not a crisis of capitalism&#8221; but, in actuality, a breakdown of a system that has &#8220;drifted away from capitalism&#8217;s most fundamental values.&#8221;</p>
<p>For a re-cap of how the U.S. drifted, <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/10/19/AR2008101901416.html" target="_blank">here&#8217;s</a> a pretty good (short) op-ed from the WaPo (August).  Title:  <em>Is Capitalism Dead?  The market that failed was not exactly free.</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://elizabethcrum.blogivists.com/2009/04/08/you-know-things-are-bad-when/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Reid Crows Over Obama&#8217;s Plans to Shut Down Yucca Mountain</title>
		<link>http://elizabethcrum.blogivists.com/2009/02/26/reid-crows-over-obamas-plans-to-shut-down-yucca/</link>
		<comments>http://elizabethcrum.blogivists.com/2009/02/26/reid-crows-over-obamas-plans-to-shut-down-yucca/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Feb 2009 21:13:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>E!!</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dina Titus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Energy Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Harry Reid]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Yucca Mountain]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gaming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[revenue]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Silver State betrayal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Titus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Yucca]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://elizabethcrum.blogivists.com/?p=627</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Harry Reid said the following in a newsletter to his constituents yesterday:
“In his budget request for 2010, President Obama will announce plans to devise a new strategy to find another solution to deal with the nation’s nuclear waste that does not include storing it in Nevada.”
This is a shame if so.  The Yucca Mountain project [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Harry Reid said the following in a newsletter to his constituents yesterday:</p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px">“In his budget request for 2010, <span class="yshortcuts">President Obama</span> will announce plans to devise a new strategy to find another solution to deal with the nation’s nuclear waste that does not include storing it in <span class="yshortcuts">Nevada.</span>”</p>
<p>This is a shame if so.  The Yucca Mountain project currently employs hundreds of people and stands to employ thousands more, not to mention the nearly $100 billion it would bring into the hurting state economy.</p>
<p>The operation of nuclear energy plants and the transportation, recycling, and storage of spent nuclear fuel can be done quite safely these days - in fact <strong><em>is</em></strong> done safely all over Europe - but apparently Harry Reid is not going to let the facts get in the way of politics-per-usual and a Wednesday press release.  (More on the latest with Yucca <a href="http://yuccafacts.blogivists.com/?p=108#more-108" target="_blank">here</a>.)</p>
<p>This is the second time in less than three weeks an Obama agenda item has dealt a heavy blow to Nevada&#8217;s economy.  What was the first, you ask?  This <span style="color: black">offhand comment recently made at a townhall meeting: </span></p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px"><span style="color: black">&#8220;You are not going to be able to give out these big bonuses until you&#8217;ve paid taxpayers back, you can&#8217;t get corporate jets, you can&#8217;t go take a trip to Las Vegas or go down to the Super Bowl on the taxpayers dime.&#8221;</span></p>
<p><span style="color: black">Rich Becker wrote an <a href="http://nevada.newsplatoon.com/2009/02/13/the-consequences-of-careless-presidential-comment/#more-131" target="_blank">excellent piece</a> on the fallout of that comment, which summed up is this:</span></p>
<p><span style="color: black">Companies are now scrambling to avoid the &#8220;stigma&#8221; of holding company functions in Las Vegas and millions of dollars have been lost due to cancelled rooms and convention events.  (These organizations aren&#8217;t really cancelling the events; they&#8217;re just relocating them.  To sunny California, mostly.)  And the tremendous l</span><span style="color: black">oss of room revenue, convention business, enertainment dollars, and gaming </span><span style="color: black">revenue is going to lead to even more layoffs than Nevada&#8217;s already seen.</span></p>
<p><span style="color: black">So where are Harry Reid (and Dina Titus) with their outrage and big press releases when Nevada&#8217;s economy really needs them?  Busy r</span><span style="color: black">ubbing elbows with a president who clearly doesn&#8217;t give a damn about the what&#8217;s best for the Silver State.</span></p>
<p><span style="color: black">I guess Nevada is now &#8220;blue&#8221; in more ways than one.</span></p>
<p><span style="color: black">But don&#8217;t just stand there and cry, good citizens.  You <strong><em>can</em></strong> do something:</span></p>
<p><span style="color: black"><a href="http://dumpreid.com/">http://dumpreid.com/</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://elizabethcrum.blogivists.com/2009/02/26/reid-crows-over-obamas-plans-to-shut-down-yucca/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>What She Said</title>
		<link>http://elizabethcrum.blogivists.com/2009/01/28/what-she-said/</link>
		<comments>http://elizabethcrum.blogivists.com/2009/01/28/what-she-said/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Jan 2009 06:02:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>E!!</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fleecing the Taxpayers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Government Spending]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Taxation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[government bailouts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bad ideas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[House]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[opposite of growth]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[stimulus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[vote]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://elizabethcrum.blogivists.com/?p=516</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Leslie Carbone, on tomorrow&#8217;s Stimulus anti-Stimulus vote in the House, that is.
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://lesliecarbone.blogspot.com/2009/01/stimulus-vote-expected-wednesday.html" target="_blank">Leslie Carbone</a>, on tomorrow&#8217;s <span style="text-decoration: line-through">Stimulus</span> anti-Stimulus vote in the House, that is.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://elizabethcrum.blogivists.com/2009/01/28/what-she-said/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Lesson of the Wise Widow</title>
		<link>http://elizabethcrum.blogivists.com/2008/11/06/the-lesson-of-the-wise-widow/</link>
		<comments>http://elizabethcrum.blogivists.com/2008/11/06/the-lesson-of-the-wise-widow/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Nov 2008 18:42:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>E!!</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2008 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Balanced Budgets]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Budget]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[deficit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[health care]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[programs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[spending]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tax credits]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://elizabethcrum.blogivists.com/?p=410</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ 
Like many Americans last week, I tuned in for the 30-minute Barack-o-mercial.  
 
In between the anecdotal close-ups of struggling American families – a widow working two jobs and raising two kids; a husband and father worried about his job at the Ford plant – I noted that Obama’s megacommercial failed to present hard data on [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt"> </p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt"><span style="font-size: 8pt;font-family: Verdana">Like many Americans last week, I tuned in for the 30-minute Barack-o-mercial.<span>  </span></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt"><span style="font-size: 8pt;color: #000000;font-family: Verdana"> </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt"><span style="font-size: 8pt;color: #000000;font-family: Verdana">In between the anecdotal close-ups of struggling American families – a widow working two jobs and raising two kids; a husband and father worried about his job at the Ford plant – I noted that Obama’s megacommercial failed to present hard data on the cost of his proposed programs and said nothing about our huge federal deficit and the corresponding budget pressures he will face once in office.<span>  </span></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 12.9pt 0in 0pt"><span style="font-size: 8pt;color: #000000;font-family: Verdana">Obam’s description of his health care plan – which “includes improving information technology, requires coverage for preventive care and pre-existing conditions, and lowers health care costs for the typical family by $2,500 a year” – sounds very nice, but there has been no independent economic analysis confirming that costs will really be reduced by that (or any) amount.</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 12.9pt 0in 0pt"><span style="font-size: 8pt;color: #000000;font-family: Verdana">Obama simply Hopes that spending $50 billion on his proposed Changes over the next five years will save the system money.<span>  </span>But even if his optimistic estimates prove out, Obama’s plan does not stipulate that the net savings by insurance and health care providers will result in lower premiums for consumers.</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 12.9pt 0in 0pt"><span style="font-size: 8pt;color: #000000;font-family: Verdana">And then we have Obama’s promises to “cut taxes for every working family making less than </span><span style="font-size: 8pt;font-family: Verdana">$200,000 a year…<span>  </span>Give businesses a tax credit for every new employee they hire…<span>  </span>Eliminate tax breaks for companies that ship jobs overseas…<span>  </span>Help homeowners by freezing foreclosures for 90 days… Provide low-cost loans to help small businesses pay their workers and keep their doors open…”</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt"><span style="font-size: 8pt;font-family: Verdana"> </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt"><span style="font-size: 8pt;font-family: Verdana">Independent analysts have estimated that combined with our current budget shortfalls, these and other of Obama’s proposals will likely result in a $1 trillion deficit next year.<span>  </span>That being unthinkable, some purging will be necessary.<span>  </span>But which of his programs will Obama cut, and why has he been promising all of them if he knows at least some must go?</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt"><span style="font-size: 8pt;font-family: Verdana"> </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt"><span style="font-size: 8pt;font-family: Verdana">Though much of his infomercial focused on the “hard realities” of life for select American families, Obama seems unwilling or unable to face reality himself.<span>  </span>It seems he could stand to learn something from that widowed mother of two who has to settle for half instead of whole gallons of milk when the money runs short – and doesn’t promise her family otherwise on the way to the store.</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt"><span style="font-size: 8pt;font-family: Verdana"> </span></p>
<p> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://elizabethcrum.blogivists.com/2008/11/06/the-lesson-of-the-wise-widow/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Nevada:  Fourth Largest Budget Shortfall</title>
		<link>http://elizabethcrum.blogivists.com/2008/10/14/nevada-fourth-largest-budget-shortfall/</link>
		<comments>http://elizabethcrum.blogivists.com/2008/10/14/nevada-fourth-largest-budget-shortfall/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Oct 2008 19:01:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>E!!</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Balanced Budgets]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Blogs of Nevada]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2008]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Budget]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[foreclosure]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gambling]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gap]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[legislative]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nevada]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ranking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[revenue]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[shortfall]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Special Session]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tourism]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://elizabethcrum.blogivists.com/?p=303</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[According to Yahoo! Finance, Nevada is behind only California, Arizona, and Florida in terms of total state budget shortfall.
Nevada’s budget gap is 16% of the total state budget or $1.2 billion.
Nevada has the worst foreclosure rate in the nation, and falling tourism and gambling revenues has slowed the economy dramatically.
A special legislative session in June resulted [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>According to <a href="http://finance.yahoo.com/loans/article/105909/States-That-Can%27t-Pay-for-Themselves">Yahoo! Finance</a>, Nevada is behind only California, Arizona, and Florida in terms of total state budget shortfall.</p>
<p>Nevada’s budget gap is 16% of the total state budget or $1.2 billion.</p>
<p>Nevada has the worst foreclosure rate in the nation, and falling tourism and gambling revenues has slowed the economy dramatically.</p>
<p>A special legislative session in June resulted in budget caps and cuts, but it’s quite likely another special session will have to be called &#8211; after the elections in November.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://elizabethcrum.blogivists.com/2008/10/14/nevada-fourth-largest-budget-shortfall/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>A Kingdom for a Sage (Ode to the Blogosphere)</title>
		<link>http://elizabethcrum.blogivists.com/2008/09/24/a-kingdom-for-a-sage-ode-to-the-blogosphere/</link>
		<comments>http://elizabethcrum.blogivists.com/2008/09/24/a-kingdom-for-a-sage-ode-to-the-blogosphere/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Sep 2008 19:06:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>E!!</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Random Bloggy Stuff]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[adaptation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[best]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[blogger]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[blogging]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[blogivist]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[blogosphere]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dollar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[E]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[e crum]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elizabeth Crum]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Muse]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ode]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ode to the Blogosphere]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[poet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ranked]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reagan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[reform]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[senators]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Shakespeare]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[web]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://elizabethcrum.blogivists.com/?p=239</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A Kingdom for a Sage (Ode to the Blogosphere)]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class="stanza-1" style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt"> </p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt"><span><span style="font-family: Arial"><em>Adapted by Elizabeth Crum -<strong> E!!</strong></em> <em>- from “A kingdom for a stage” by William Shakespeare [from Henry V]</em></span></span></p>
<p class="stanza-1" style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt"> </p>
<p class="stanza-1" style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt"><span style="font-size: 9pt;font-family: Verdana">O for a Muse of moderation, that would ascend<br />
The brightest netwave of invention,<br />
A kingdom for a Sage, senators to act<br />
And bloggers to behold the swelling scene!</span></p>
<p class="stanza-1" style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt"> </p>
<p class="stanza-1" style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt"><span style="font-size: 9pt;font-family: Verdana">Then should the warlike pol, like Reagan,<br />
Assume the port of Mars; and at his heels,<br />
Leash&#8217;d in like hounds, should dollar and dividend<br />
Crouch for employment. And pardon not, O Blogivists,<br />
The doltish congressmen who dare </span></p>
<p class="stanza-1" style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt"><span style="font-size: 9pt;font-family: Verdana">On their unworthy stage to recommend forth<br />
Their idiotic plans:<span>  </span>can that intellectual vacuum hold<br />
The vasty notions of fiscal responsibility?<span>  </span>Or will we cram<br />
Within this week the very blunders<br />
That did affright the kings of Wall Street?</span></p>
<p class="stanza-1" style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt"> </p>
<p class="stanza-1" style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt"><span style="font-size: 9pt;font-family: Verdana">O, pardon! since a crooked politician may<br />
Protest while pocketing a million;<br />
So let us, Bloggers in this great sphere,<br />
Type, click and upload on screens galore.</span></p>
<p class="stanza-1" style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt"> </p>
<p class="stanza-1" style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt"> <span style="font-size: 9pt;font-family: Verdana">Today within the corridors of Congress<br />
We see confined two indistinguishible parties,<br />
Whose egos are exceeded only by their greed<br />
And perilous corruption splits all asunder:<br />
Piece out their imperfections with your posts;<br />
Into a thousand parts divide their rhetoric,<br />
And make it clear to all who rules this realm:</span></p>
<p class="stanza-1" style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt"> </p>
<p class="stanza-1" style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt"><span style="font-size: 9pt;font-family: Verdana">The Blogosphere, in all its glory rides</span></p>
<p class="stanza-1" style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt"><span style="font-size: 9pt;font-family: Verdana">Printing our apt remarks i&#8217; the receiving Web;<br />
For &#8217;tis our thoughts that now shall thump our kings,<br />
Chase them here and there; Twittering and<br />
Turning the empty accomplishment of many years<br />
Into pithy posts:  for the further supply of which<br />
Welcome us Bloggers to this great Webstory;<br />
We pundit-like your online reading pray,</span></p>
<p class="stanza-1" style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt"><span style="font-size: 9pt;font-family: Verdana">Bookmark our blogs, and kindly judge our daily Play.</span></p>
<p class="stanza-1" style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt"> </p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt"><span style="font-size: 10pt;color: #0000ff;font-family: Arial">-</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt"><span style="font-size: 9pt;color: #333333;font-family: Arial"> </span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://elizabethcrum.blogivists.com/2008/09/24/a-kingdom-for-a-sage-ode-to-the-blogosphere/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Financial Crisis:  Laughter is the Best Medicine</title>
		<link>http://elizabethcrum.blogivists.com/2008/09/23/financial-crisis-laughter-is-the-best-medicine/</link>
		<comments>http://elizabethcrum.blogivists.com/2008/09/23/financial-crisis-laughter-is-the-best-medicine/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Sep 2008 17:22:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>E!!</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[LOL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[government bailouts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bailouts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[financial crisis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[joke]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://elizabethcrum.blogivists.com/?p=236</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I like Jim Henley’s one-liner: “Wouldn’t it save administrative costs if I just started giving my money to random rich people?”
(H/T:  Outside the Beltway)
 
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p style="text-align: justify"><span style="color: #000000">I like <a href="http://highclearing.com/index.php/archives/2008/09/20/8718" target="_blank"><span style="font-size: small;color: #5588aa;font-family: Verdana">Jim Henley’s</span></a><span style="font-size: small"><span style="font-family: Verdana"> one-liner: “Wouldn’t it save administrative costs if I just started giving my money to random rich people?”</span></span></span></p>
<p style="text-align: justify"><span style="font-size: small;font-family: Verdana">(H/T:  <a href="http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/best_joke_about_the_financial_crisis/" target="_blank">Outside the Beltway</a>)</span></p>
<p style="text-align: justify"> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://elizabethcrum.blogivists.com/2008/09/23/financial-crisis-laughter-is-the-best-medicine/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Club for Growth Chimes In</title>
		<link>http://elizabethcrum.blogivists.com/2008/09/23/club-for-growth-chimes-in/</link>
		<comments>http://elizabethcrum.blogivists.com/2008/09/23/club-for-growth-chimes-in/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Sep 2008 13:25:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>E!!</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Balanced Budgets]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fleecing the Taxpayers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[government bailouts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[allocation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[assets]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bailout]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[banks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[capital]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Club for Growth]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Conservative Leadership Conference]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[credit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[debt]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[financial]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GDP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Housing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[liquidity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Toomey]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[trillion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[unintended consequences]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wall Street]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://elizabethcrum.blogivists.com/?p=235</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I had the honor of meeting and assisting Pat Toomey last week at the Conservative Leadership Conference here in Las Vegas.  This morning, Club for Growth says/releases the following (excerpted):
Eighteen months into the credit crunch, many largely capitalized financial services firms are experiencing serious difficulties but the overall economy continues to grow.  GDP growth over [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I had the honor of meeting and assisting Pat Toomey last week at the Conservative Leadership Conference here in Las Vegas.  This morning, <a href="http://www.clubforgrowth.org/" target="_blank">Club for Growth</a> says/releases the following (excerpted):</p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px"><span>Eighteen months into the credit crunch, many largely capitalized financial services firms are experiencing serious difficulties but the overall economy continues to grow.  GDP growth over the past 12 months was 2.25 percent and 3.5 percent when excluding the drag imposed by the housing sector.  Even within the financial sector, many banks are doing well.  Regional bank indices had risen significantly since the lows of last July—prior to the bailout announcement—and thousands of community banks are thriving.  It is extraordinary that a massive government intervention in the economy is considered inevitable when the economy is not even in a recession.</span></p>
<p><span>Indeed it is.  On what is the panic of Wall Street types based?  Could it be fear that lack of liquidity and credit in the market will affect their <strong>own</strong> bank accounts?</span></p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px"><span>At the same time, socializing economic risks come at a great cost to the American economy by misallocating capital, inviting political manipulation, and putting taxpayers on the hook for possibly a trillion dollars.  Such a large takeover by the government will surely be accompanied by adverse, unintended consequences.  Already, other companies and industries are lining up at government’s door asking for their own bailout.  And if the government incurs $700 billion in debt to finance the purchase of bad bank assets, the danger that it will eventually monetize that debt and trigger dramatic inflation is very worrisome.</span></p>
<p><span>&#8220;Unintended consequences.&#8221;  This concept is one of the great underlying tenets of conservative thought.  The idea is that when one makes broad, sweeping changes there are always unplanned effects, and they are often worse than the problem with which you began.</span></p>
<p><span>Our Do Nothing Congress should, in this case, do nothing (other than what Newt said yesterday).  We ought to free things up where we can, allow the market to self-correct, and let those who must (and should) take their proverbial Lumps.  </span></p>
<p><span>Access to unlimited cash and credit is not a &#8220;human right,&#8221; and we should stop behaving as if it is.</span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://elizabethcrum.blogivists.com/2008/09/23/club-for-growth-chimes-in/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Nevada Needs to Take a Second Look at Yucca</title>
		<link>http://elizabethcrum.blogivists.com/2008/08/30/nevada-needs-to-take-a-second-look-at-yucca/</link>
		<comments>http://elizabethcrum.blogivists.com/2008/08/30/nevada-needs-to-take-a-second-look-at-yucca/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Aug 2008 22:49:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>E!!</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blogs of Nevada]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cold Hard Cash]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Energy Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Harry Reid]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Yucca Mountain]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[application]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DOE]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[jobs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[legal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Loux]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nuclear medicine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[opposition]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[petition]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reagan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reid]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[repository]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Test Site]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Yucca]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://elizabethcrum.blogivists.com/?p=185</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Seems the All-Powerful and All-Knowing Wizard Harry Reid got all of 4,000 signatures on an Anti-Yucca petition urging the Nuclear Regulatory Commission not to approve the application for the Department of Energy to begin construction.  If there is as much opposition to Yucca as Reid claims, why so few Johnny Hancocks?
The whole Yucca &#8220;controversy&#8221; continues to amaze me.  What I&#8217;ve [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Seems the All-Powerful and All-Knowing Wizard Harry Reid got all of 4,000 signatures on an Anti-Yucca petition urging the Nuclear Regulatory Commission not to approve the application for the Department of Energy to begin construction.  If there is as much opposition to Yucca as Reid claims, why so few Johnny Hancocks?</p>
<p>The whole Yucca &#8220;controversy&#8221; continues to amaze me.  What I&#8217;ve found from talking to regular folks is that Yucca really <em>isn&#8217;t</em> all that controversial except in the minds of Reid and others who are rabidly against it.  Most people seem to realize that Nevada would draw a HUGE paycheck in exchange for supporting the infrastructure of Yucca.  They are also appreciative of the potential cash boost to our construction industry and the creation of thousands of permanent jobs.</p>
<p>Here&#8217;s a little history lesson:</p>
<p>The U.S. Dept. of Energy had its first public meeting in Nevada on Yucca Mountain in 1983.  Don Veith, the Yucca Mountain project manager, presented an overview of the legislation.  The meeting was then opened to public comment.  Governor Richard Bryan stood and announced that he was &#8220;unalterably opposed&#8221; to the storage of &#8220;nuclear waste&#8221; in Nevada.  A surrogate for then-Congressman Harry Reid echoed the congressman&#8217;s &#8220;strong opposition.&#8221;  According to those present, most other attendees expressed an opinion along the lines of, &#8220;Interesting &#8211; maybe there&#8217;s something in it for us.&#8221;</p>
<p>But via the governor&#8217;s office and the Nevada Agency for Nuclear Projects (created in &#8216;85), the state officially adopted a negative view of Yucca.  And under Director Bob Loux, Yucca has faced two decades of unrelenting criticism and obstruction.</p>
<p>Along the way, several multi-billion dollar offers have been informally made to Nevada by the DOE and/or nuclear industry in exchange for the state&#8217;s acceptance of the repository.  At one point, the Reagan administration offered Nevada a multi-billion-dollar nuclear medicine and nuclear science research facility to be associated with UNLV and situated on the Nevada Test Site.  The offer was flatly rejected.</p>
<p>Ladies and gents, spent nuclear fuel is presently stored at temporary sites around the nation.  It is stored safely and without incident.  The nuclear reactors that render efficient electricity are also operated safely and without incident.  For the good of our economy and our nation, we should all take a second look at Yucca.  Please contact me if you would like to get on a Yucca Mountain mailing list and participate in future discussions, forums, panels, and meet-ups.</p>
<p><span style="font-family: 'Goudy Old Style','serif'"> </p>
<p></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://elizabethcrum.blogivists.com/2008/08/30/nevada-needs-to-take-a-second-look-at-yucca/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>What Recession?</title>
		<link>http://elizabethcrum.blogivists.com/2008/08/30/what-recession/</link>
		<comments>http://elizabethcrum.blogivists.com/2008/08/30/what-recession/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Aug 2008 17:46:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>E!!</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GDP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[household]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[income]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Labor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[median]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[poll]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[recession]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[second quarter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[up]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://elizabethcrum.blogivists.com/?p=180</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[From the American Enterprise Institute:
The nation&#8217;s GDP grew at a surprising 3.3 percent rate in the second quarter, up from 0.9 in the first quarter. That is welcome news for the nation&#8217;s 154 million strong labor force on this Labor Day holiday. The Census Bureau reported that, in 2007, real median household income rose for [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>From the American Enterprise Institute:</p>
<p><em>The nation&#8217;s GDP grew at a surprising 3.3 percent rate in the second quarter, up from 0.9 in the first quarter. That is welcome news for the nation&#8217;s 154 million strong labor force on this <span class="yshortcuts">Labor Day</span> holiday. The <span class="yshortcuts">Census Bureau</span> reported that, in 2007, real <span class="yshortcuts">median household income</span> rose for the third straight year, a point</em><a rel="nofollow" href="http://www.aei.org/besharov/" target="_blank"><strong><span style="color: #003399"><em> <span class="yshortcuts">Douglas J. Besharov</span></em></span></strong></a><em> made at an AEI </em><a rel="nofollow" href="http://www.aei.org/event1785/" target="_blank"><strong><span class="yshortcuts"><span style="color: #003399"><em>conference</em></span></span></strong></a><em> on August 25. </em></p>
<p><em>Although most Americans are uneasy about the nation&#8217;s economy, they remain optimistic about their personal prospects. In a recent HarrisInteractive poll, only 18 percent said the country was on the right track; 76 percent felt that way about their personal lives. </em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://elizabethcrum.blogivists.com/2008/08/30/what-recession/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
