<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>E!! The True Conservative Story™ &#187; reductions</title>
	<atom:link href="http://elizabethcrum.blogivists.com/tag/reductions/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://elizabethcrum.blogivists.com</link>
	<description>Elizabeth Crum !! Putting the "E" in conservative blogging in Nevada &#38; nationally</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 01 Jun 2009 02:31:55 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Comparing Tax Policies:  McCain v. Obama</title>
		<link>http://elizabethcrum.blogivists.com/2008/09/16/comparing-tax-policies-mccain-v-obama/</link>
		<comments>http://elizabethcrum.blogivists.com/2008/09/16/comparing-tax-policies-mccain-v-obama/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Sep 2008 19:22:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>E!!</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2008 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fleecing the Taxpayers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John McCain]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Taxation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[children]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[corporate taxes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dependents]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[exemption]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[income]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[income tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[investment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jack Kemp]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[McCain]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[middle-class]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[percent]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[poor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[reductions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[revenue]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rich]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[savings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tax bracket]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tax Credit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tax cuts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tax increases]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[work]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://elizabethcrum.blogivists.com/?p=221</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If there&#8217;s one thing I&#8217;ve learned from blogging and receiving tons of email, we all have our &#8220;pet&#8221; electoral issues and hot buttons &#8211; and they vary widely from person to person.  For me, it&#8217;s national security first; the economy (and tax policy) second; and energy policy (a closely related) third.
On the subject of the economy, Jack Kemp has [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If there&#8217;s one thing I&#8217;ve learned from blogging and receiving tons of email, we all have our &#8220;pet&#8221; electoral issues and hot buttons &#8211; and they vary widely from person to person.  For me, it&#8217;s national security first; the economy (and tax policy) second; and energy policy (a closely related) third.</p>
<p>On the subject of the economy, Jack Kemp has a <a href="http://nevada-rlc.org/2008-election/tax-cuts-for-the-middle-class/" target="_blank">good op-ed</a> on the presidential candidates and their proposed tax plans (thanks to Mike Davis at the NV RLC for bringing it to my attention).  I strongly encourage voters to read the whole thing, but here are some key points (summarized in my own words):</p>
<p>Barack Obama says he supports a tax cut in the form of a $500 refundable income tax credit for all workers (except those in the top 5 percent of income earners, who will pay more taxes) &#8220;unless the economy remains weak.”  So&#8230;Obama <em>does</em> recognize that tax increases on the rich have a negative effect on the overall economy.  (But why does he think that matters only in &#8220;weak&#8221; economic times?)</p>
<p>Obama’s tax credit does <em>not</em> reduce marginal tax rates, so it won&#8217;t benefit the general economy because it provides no long term (additional) incentives for work, savings, investment or business expansion.  (People will get their $500 refund check, spend it, and that will be That.)</p>
<p>On the other hand, McCain wants to <em>double </em>the personal exemption for dependents from $3,500 to $7,000 for families <em>regardless of income</em>.  (For middle-class workers in the 25% tax bracket, the $3,500 exemption increase would reduce their tax liability by $875 for each child.  Families with three children are thus looking at $2,600+ in tax savings.)</p>
<p><em>And </em>McCain proposes marginal tax rate reductions &#8211; which is great news in country that pays the <em>second highest corporate tax rates</em> in the entire industrialized world.  McCain wants to reduce the federal corporate tax rate from 35 percent to 25 percent &#8211; a boon for middle class workers in the form of new jobs, better pay, and a stronger dollar.</p>
<p>And all this will most likely <em>raise </em>rather than reduce tax revenues.  (Why?  Kemp cites a 2007 study by the Treasury Department which showed that Ireland — with a 12.5% corporate tax rate — raises just shy of 50 percent more revenue on a comparative basis than the U.S. does with a 35 percent rate!)</p>
<p>McCain would also keep the top capital gains tax rate and dividend tax at 15% which is needed in the stock world (stocks are now held by more than 2/3rds of all Americans).  McCain further wants to phase out the Alternative Minimum Tax (AMT) which burdens 25 million middle-class families with another $2,700 in taxes each year (on average).</p>
<p>Obama, by contrast, has proposed to <em>raise </em>marginal tax rates for <em>almost every federal tax</em> — the individual income tax, the capital gains tax, the dividends tax, the payroll tax, the death tax, etc. <em>and </em>he would increase corporate taxes where and when he could.</p>
<p>McCain&#8217;s plan is a good start, but I agree with Kemp:  we need to promote <em>additional </em>middle-class tax cuts through fundamental reform of our &#8220;confusing, contradictory and confiscatory tax code.&#8221;</p>
<p>Kemp outlines a proposal by Rep. Paul Ryan, R-Wis. to allow workers to choose a flatter tax system (which is also worth reading about, at the end of his op-ed). </p>
<p style="text-align: center"> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://elizabethcrum.blogivists.com/2008/09/16/comparing-tax-policies-mccain-v-obama/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
